tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4067977173951690762.post7699700302496982605..comments2023-10-05T08:44:09.303-07:00Comments on JG, Caesarea: David Brooks, "The Russia I Miss": Then They Came for the JewsJeffrey Grossmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01847518948270295312noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4067977173951690762.post-50464245981862830882015-09-11T05:17:24.160-07:002015-09-11T05:17:24.160-07:00Try to find ANY reference to the terrorist attacks...Try to find ANY reference to the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001 in Today's NY Times. I couldn't.<br />Hard to believe how some people choose to forget.<br />Sad.<br /><br />http://www.nytimes.com/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4067977173951690762.post-72665105145490836272015-09-11T05:06:37.190-07:002015-09-11T05:06:37.190-07:00this is all there is about the disappearance:
htt...this is all there is about the disappearance:<br /><br />http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/09/nyt-quietly-removes-list-of-jewish-lawmakers.html#<br />by Margaret Hartmann<br />"...The "Jewish?" column has been omitted, but there is no explanation for the change, other than a note that the article was updated at 6:42 p.m. on Thursday. The following line was also added to the introduction: "Though more Jewish members of Congress support the deal than oppose it, of the 23 Democrats against the deal, 15 are Jewish." However, according to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, only eight Democrats who oppose the deal are Jewish.<br /><br />The accompanying article originally explained that the debate over the deal "divided Democrats between their loyalties to the president and their constituents, especially Jewish ones ... " but now it says "The debate divided Democrats between their loyalties to the president and to their constituents ... "<br /> <br />While the Times recently took flak for taking several days to explain significant changes to articles about Hillary Clinton's email, so far the only acknowledgement of the changes has come from Jonathan Weisman, the paper's deputy Washington editor, on Twitter:<br />..."<br /><br />As for Mr. Brooks on Russia? He needs Russia-Rehab in Helsinki. The Finns understand all the "Russias" that have ever been... and want Karelia returned!<br /><br />kAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com