In her latest New York Times op-ed entitled "He Has a Dream," Maureen Dowd tells us that Obama has "deputized Al Sharpton" in order to deal with Ferguson. Highlighting past escapades of Sharpton, whom she labels "a self-promoting TV pundit with an incendiary record," Dowd concludes:
"Obama has muzzled himself on race and made Sharpton his chosen instrument — two men joined in pragmatism at a moment when idealism is needed.
We can’t expect the president to do everything. But we can expect him to do something."
Ouch.
But more to the point, what should we be expecting of Obama? He is an orator and a writer of books about himself. He still has no managerial experience.
His use of Sharpton? Why should we be surprised? Obama is a radical in moderate's clothing. There was Obama's association with Rashid Khalidi (the 2003 videotape of Obama and Khalidi is still safely locked away in a Los Angeles Times vault). And in March 2009, "activist" (I hate the word) Van Jones was forced to resign as Special Advisor for Green Jobs, but now, with just over two years remaining of his presidency, perhaps Obama feels that he can comfortably do whatever he wants without repercussions.
What should we expect of Obama in 2017 and thereafter? More golf and more books about himself for certain. In addition, Jimmy Carter, a dedicated Israel-hater who has grown decrepit with age, is desperately searching for a successor.
Yes, the world has turned foul.
"Obama feels that he can comfortably do whatever he wants without repercussions."
ReplyDeleteProbably yes, and I hope he is wrong. On Monday, in his speech to the American Legion, he blamed America for "occupying countries" and "FEEDING extremism"
Looks like treason to me.
Obama reminds me of the individuals who thought that supporting American efforts in WWII was wrong because America was an "imperialistic power."
Aw...is the NYT sounding demoralized or am I imagining it? This must be VERY serious.
ReplyDelete