"No deal is better than a bad deal"? "Anytime, anywhere" inspections? If Iran violates the agreement, sanctions will "snap-back"? All lies.
Ehud Yaari of Israel's Channel 2 News informed Israelis on Friday night that after Obama caved on all major sticking points, the P5+1 will be signing an agreement with Iran early next week.
The advent of a deal has also been noted by Vladimir Putin, at a time when Russia is hoping to sell billions of dollars of armaments to Iran.
Similarly, as reported by Iran's Fars News Agency:
"Head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) Ali Akbar Salehi voiced his satisfaction with the ongoing trend of nuclear negotiations between Tehran and the world powers in Vienna, and said that there is still a strong possibility for striking a final agreement in the Austrian capital."
In what for him is the foreign affairs highlight of his presidency, Obama has sown the seeds of a second Holocaust. It was inevitable.
"The [United States] Navy says it won’t have an aircraft carrier in the Middle East for a couple of months this fall. ..." [probably will not happen, but timing of announcement is the point]
ReplyDeletehttp://breakingdefense.com/2015/07/navy-likely-to-fill-carrier-gap-readiness-will-suffer/
This has not gotten any echo, but is a symbol of, ahem, unseriousness, to Iran.
Perhaps the real dilemma is finding the trigger that makes Iran walk away, albeit threatening to ramp up their programs with NO inspections.
which they probably will do even with a signed piece of paper.
k