Roger Cohen, who in the past insisted that "Iran is not totalitarian", now concludes: "It is time for the United States to help Iran’s emergence from isolation . . . through firmness allied to creative diplomacy and sustained involvement."
"Creative diplomacy and sustained involvement"? Sorry, Roger, but I don't have a clue what you're talking about, although it did require "sustained involvement" to make it through your op-ed. My guess is that your elusive verbiage would elicit chuckles from the persons being tortured to death in Evin Prison in Tehran.
"Firmness", however, I do understand, as does Ahmadinejad, and regarding firmness, please consider the following chain of events:
“I would never take a military option off the table.”
Barack Obama on Iran, throughout the 2008 presidential campaign.
"We are not taking any option off the table at all.”
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, January 2009 Senate confirmation hearing, responding to a question concerning the Iran military option.
"What we are going to be working on over the next several weeks is developing a significant regime of sanctions that will indicate to [Iran] how isolated they are from the international community as a whole."
Barack Obama, Press Conference, February 9, 2010
"Obviously, we don't want Iran to become a nuclear weapons power, but we are not planning anything other than going for sanctions."
Hillary Clinton, Al-Arabiya television, Wednesday, February 17, 2010.
"We are moving expeditiously and thoroughly in the Security Council, I can't give you an exact date, but I would assume some time in the next several months."
Hillary Clinton on her plane to Buenos Aires, responding to the question when the U.S. might seek sanctions against Iran, March 2, 2010.
Firmness? The Obama administration is obviously in need of Viagra.
Thanks for the advice, Roger. You've been so right in the past.
Hi, Jeffrey. They removed Cohen's article from the front page of the online paper this morning. I am curious, why?
ReplyDeleteI saw him on TV recently. He was on some panel with other prominent Israel-haters, arguing that USA should stop friendly relationship with Israel. The guy found his calling, and he is in high demand.
Marina, I also noticed that he was not listed on the home page of The Times, and this is the second time that I have seen this happen in recent days. Does it indicate a demotion?
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't surprise me that Cohen is assuming this new role as an Israel basher, milking his family name.
Note how the Leveretts have found a niche by befriending the Islamic Republic of Iran.
I like the expression "milking his family name". It is what Goldstone and Finkelstein do too.
ReplyDelete