Another Sunday and another Frank Rich diatribe, "The Very Useful Idiocy of Christine O’Donnell" (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/03/opinion/03rich.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss), condemning those nasty, conniving Republicans. This week, Christine O’Donnell, who opposes masturbation, has Frank in a dither.
Me? I'm more troubled by the half-hearted decision of Democrat Obama, as described by Bob Woodward in "Obama's Wars", to escalate the Afghanistan war and send brave young Americans to their graves for no reason other than to promote Obama's image as something more than a wuss.
Christine O'Donnell is a "useful idiot" providing weekly material for the nation's comedy series? Maybe. But what then is Obama? Neither useful nor an idiot, he must nevertheless take responsibility for an inane, burgeoning, heart breaking tragedy which America can no longer afford.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yes it is interesting that the liberal media do not debate what she stands for- smaller government and less taxes- but seem to focus on ad-hominum attacks. Lets hear about her Marxist opponent for a change. I will take a somewhat odd anti-tax and spend conservative over a Marxist any day.
ReplyDeleteHere we go again. O'Donnell is going to be ripped apart by the left leaning outlets of the media. They will use her 1996 anti masturbation stance as a way camouflage what she really stands for. The big problem is that most of her detractors will mindlessly follow the media like the blind sheep they are. What's wrong with anti masturbation? It tells me she has conviction, moral fortitude and some pretty damn good willpower. I myself, must lack all of these qualities, but I can appreciate her stance. After all, not all of us need to act like caged monkeys.
ReplyDeleteChristine, being anti-masturbation, would be offended by this blog and the comments within.
ReplyDelete