"You are either in control, or out of control."
Make no mistake about it, in the Middle East Obama is "out of control".
After Obama refused to back, even vocally, the dissidents in Iran in 2009, their street rebellion was destined to failure.
More recently, Obama called for, and received, the head of Mubarak, a long-time U.S. ally.
Now, after Obama claimed that the United States is "slowly tightening the noose" on Qaddafi (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110311/ap_on_re_us/us_obama) and Hillary declared that "nothing is off the table" regarding a possible U.S. response to the Libyan crisis (http://blogs.voanews.com/breaking-news/2011/02/28/clinton-no-option-off-table-in-libya-crisis-2/), we now know that the U.S. is refusing to back the no-fly zone sponsored by France and the U.K. (see: http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/03/14/un.libya.no.fly.talks/index.html?hpt=T2). We also know that on Monday Qaddafi's forces had retaken the town of Zuwara from the rebels (http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/03/15/libya.civil.war/index.html?hpt=T2). Apparently that noose around Qaddafi's neck is tightening very, very, very slowly.
Saudi Arabia is furious with Obama, and without consulting the U.S., which has shown itself to be impotent in Saudi eyes, it has sent, together with the United Arab Emirates, 2,000 troops to Bahrain in support of its Sunni leadership. Bahrain's king, Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, is facing opposition from the island's majority Shiite population, and the entry of Saudi and UAE soldiers has in turn raised the wrath of Iran, which is labeling the troop movement an "invasion" (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/16/world/middleeast/16bahrain.html?hp).
Meanwhile, the Obama administration is reeling from the recent refusal of Saudi Arabia to play host to Secretary of Defense Gates and Secretary of State Clinton, who were both forced to cancel their visits to the desert kingdom. According to The New York Times, "American officials were left wondering whether the cause was King Abdullah’s frail health — or his pique at the United States" (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/15/world/middleeast/15saudi.html?hp).
I cannot believe how daft and obtuse the Obama administration can be, but in any event, so as to leave no stone unturned, I picked up the phone earlier today to King Abdullah, and he is indeed livid with Obama. I don't think I've ever heard this 87-year-old monarch so angry.
As I stated at the outset, "You are either in control or out of control." In the Middle East, as elsewhere, Obama is out of control.
Hi, Jeffrey
ReplyDeleteIt is news for me that Saudis did not let Clinton and Gates in. These two had to cancel their visits - so, they planned the visit, but they were not allowed to enter! How often does it happen?!
How things have changed in two years! Now, nobody would let Obama in to listen his next "Cairo speech"...
Obama knows whose side to take when it is Muslims against Jews. Everything else is too complicated for him.
When Iran cries "invasion!" you would think, from their point of view, especially Ahmadinijad"s that this were a good thing. Isn't his intention to usher in the Mahdi through a great apocalypse in the Middle East. This was told to an envoy by Ahmadinijad's spritual advisor.
ReplyDeleteIt was described to him as follows: "A crown of glory with the jewel of the wealth of the world is placed on a martyr's head. He is given 72 black-eyed, incorruptible virgins in his mansion. He attends a glorious wedding—his wedding—and through the shedding of his blood, the martyr atones for 70 of his relatives that they may escape the horrors of hell."
So you would think this with this escalation, he can already hear the wedding bells peeling.