Telling us in her latest New York Times op-ed entitled "Reigning Cats and Dogs" that "AFTER running as a man last time around, Hillary Clinton is now running as a woman," Maureen Dowd proceeds to quote Hillary as saying:
"I just think women in general are better listeners, are more collegial, more open to new ideas and how to make things work in a way that looks for win-win outcomes."
Better listeners and more collegial? I wonder if Hillary ever took the time to listen to and befriend Juanita Broaddrick, who tweeted on January 6, 2016:
"I was 35 years old when Bill Clinton, Ark. Attorney General raped me and Hillary tried to silence me. I am now 73....it never goes away."
Novel ideas? Yup, that homebrew server, operating out of a bathroom closet while Hillary was secretary of state, was certainly a doozy. It was so newfangled that the FBI recently expanded its criminal examination of the use of the server to a possible nexus between Clinton Foundation activities and State Department work.
Win-win outcomes? I suppose that's what was being offered to parties donating millions to the Clinton Foundation.
However, after deciding that Hillary is now running as a woman, Dowd goes on to say:
"It may be more relevant to ask if someone is a cat or a dog."
I know very little about cats, but regarding dogs, Groucho Marx once declared:
"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read."
Groucho could never have imagined the pitch-black inner workings of Hillary, who, neither cat nor dog (let's not insult those cuddly animals), is her own best friend.
A possible presidential contest between Hillary and Donald? Surely we've arrived in hell.